NRS-429VN VARK Analysis Paper Assignment Example Three Preferred Learning Strategy

 

According to my VARK assessment, my favored learning strategy is the multimodal approach, encompassing aural (listening) and kinesthetic (doing) methods. In this assessment, I scored 10 in aural and 9 in kinesthetic learning, highlighting a strong inclination towards these two strategies.

In my aural learning preference, I thrive on absorbing ideas through discussions, emphasizing concepts with a variety of voices. I find clarity in explaining what I learn through verbal communication. I often read my notes aloud, aiding my understanding of concepts. Additionally, discussing and explaining notes to a peer with similar aural preferences enhances my retention, as I tend to remember information better through hearing and speaking.

Embracing the kinesthetic learning strategy, I discover that I excel when engaged in practical activities. Physical involvement in creating and designing concepts resonates with my learning style. Real-world experiences, such as visiting sites and collaborating with community members, are vital to my understanding. As a nurse, I prefer learning about immunization processes in a clinical setting, allowing me to observe and participate actively in the procedures. These preferences align seamlessly with the strategies outlined for kinesthetic learners on the VARK website (VARK, 2020).

This multimodal learning approach, combining aural and kinesthetic strategies, allows me to leverage diverse methods for a comprehensive and effective learning experience.
Individual Learning Styles and Educational Activities
Individual learning styles significantly impact the understanding of educational activities. As a kinesthetic and aural learner, my understanding is heightened when I observe and engage in real-world applications. For example, as a nurse, witnessing immunization procedures in a clinical setting enhances my comprehension.

Educators must identify students’ learning styles to tailor lesson materials accordingly. Aligning the teaching approach with students’ preferences fosters effective learning. For instance, using aural methods for read/write learners may lead to challenges. Considering learning styles enhances collaboration and cooperation in the classroom, preventing frustration and maintaining focus.

Understanding learning styles in health promotion is pivotal for achieving desired outcomes. Tailoring health education to participants’ preferred styles ensures better understanding and accurate implementation. For a diabetic patient with a read/write preference, providing written instructions for insulin injection may be more effective than a demonstration.

This understanding also promotes collaboration and adherence from patients, crucial for positive health outcomes. Adapting teaching styles to patients’ preferences fosters a deeper understanding of health concepts, increasing the likelihood of behavioral change. For instance, if a patient with a kinesthetic preference encounters a clinician using the same style, they are more likely to adjust their practices for improved health.
Individual Learning Styles and Their Impact on Educational Activities
Individual learning styles play a crucial role in shaping the understanding of educational activities, as they influence how learners absorb and process information. In my case, I identify with the kinesthetic and aural styles. The kinesthetic style involves using my senses, particularly sight, to learn, as seen in my preference for observing real-world activities like immunizations in clinical settings. This hands-on approach enhances my retention of knowledge.

Educators bear the responsibility of recognizing students’ learning styles, a task essential for tailoring learning materials to align with these preferences (Bastable, 2019). For instance, if students favor the read/write style, educators should provide written materials and encourage note-taking to facilitate their understanding. Failure to align teaching methods with students’ learning styles, such as using aural approaches for those inclined towards read/write styles, may hinder comprehension and render lessons less effective.

Considering learners’ styles is pivotal for promoting collaboration and cooperation in the classroom (Bastable, 2019). Mismatched teaching methods can lead to frustration, resulting in distractions and a lack of focus among students. This mismatch might manifest as students engaging in off-topic conversations instead of concentrating on the lesson. To cultivate collaboration and cooperation, educators should adopt teaching styles that resonate with students’ familiar and preferred learning approaches, thereby boosting overall classroom engagement.

Understanding and accommodating diverse learning styles contribute significantly to creating an effective and inclusive learning environment.
Learning Styles and Their Impact on Health Promotion
Understanding learning styles in health promotion is pivotal for achieving successful outcomes. Tailoring health education to align with participants’ learning styles enhances comprehension and the accurate implementation of health concepts. During health promotion sessions, educators should assess participants’ learning styles to customize information delivery. For example, when instructing a diabetic patient on insulin injection, considering their learning style is crucial. If the patient prefers the read/write style, providing written instructions might be more effective than a hands-on demonstration.

Furthermore, awareness of learning styles in health promotion encourages collaboration and adherence from patients, crucial for positive health outcomes (Sharma & Branscum, 2020). When clinicians align their communication with patients’ preferred styles, it fosters trust and cooperation. For instance, if a patient prefers the aural learning style, clinicians should verbalize prescription details rather than relying solely on written instructions. This personalized approach promotes patient engagement, understanding, and, ultimately, adherence to health interventions.

Learning styles significantly impact the potential for behavioral change by facilitating a deeper understanding of concepts. When patients encounter educators who match their learning style, it enhances comprehension and motivates behavioral adjustments. For instance, a patient with a kinesthetic learning preference, when guided by a clinical educator using a hands-on approach, is more likely to understand and implement health recommendations effectively.
Reference
Bastable, S. (2019). Health Professional as Educator. Jones & Bartlett Learning.

Sharma, M., & Branscum, P. (2020). Foundations of Mental Health Promotion. Jones & Bartlett Learning.

VARK. (2020). VARK – A Guide to Learning Styles. Retrieved from https://vark-learn.com.