Case Study For Alcohol Addiction And High Blood Pressure This discussion covers a case of a homeless 54-year-old Caucasian referred to our clinic for care after a recent hospitalization and alcohol-related seizure. His health history shows he was an alcohol addict with high blood pressure. The discussion analyzed specific socioeconomic, spiritual, lifestyle, and other cultural factors associated with the patient. It also provides sensitive issues to focus on while interacting with the patient and five targeted questions Case Study For Alcohol Addiction And High Blood Pressure.
The goal of the study was to evaluate medication administration mistakes made by nurses in general medical and surgical units. The main reason the article was chosen is that it discusses research done on MAEs by nurses working in medical-surgical units. Using stratified random sampling with the medical and surgical units as the strata, 100 nurses were proportionately selected for the descriptive cross-sectional study. The study included a total of 200 observations by adding two more observations of each nurse while dispensing medication. Two different technologies were used to obtain the data for the current inquiry.
The interviewer provided a questionnaire about medicine delivery errors as well as a disguised drug administration observation checklist. Data was collected over a period of four months and subsequently analyzed using descriptive and inferential statistics to seek for correlations between variables. The study’s findings revealed that, respectively, 27%, 23%, and 15% of the nurses who took part in it admitted to giving medication at the wrong time, at the wrong rate, or after getting a written order to stop. Nurses must recognize the prevalence of MAEs as a patient safety indicator in order to comprehend and prevent MAEs through rationalized drug management policies and guidelines.
Koyama, A.K., Maddox, C-S.S., Li, L., Bucknall, T., & Westbrook, J.I. (2019). Effectiveness of double checking to reduce medication administration errors: A systematic review. BMJ Quality & Safety, 29(7), 1-9. Applying Research Skills Assignment Discussion http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjqs-2019-009552
The study’s goal was to perform a systematic assessment of research that evaluated the evidence for the value of double checking in lowering MAEs. Because the paper focuses specifically on MAEs and their prevention, it was picked. Five databases were searched for studies examining the use and effectiveness of double checking on reducing medication delivery errors in a hospital setting.
A collection of thirteen research investigations were looked at, and it was found that double-checking adherence rates varied from 52% to 97% of administrations. The claim that a lower incidence of MAEs or less harm results from double versus single medication administration checks is not sufficiently supported by the available data. More research is required to demonstrate whether double checking actually improves patient safety to the point where the large costs required are justified.
Conclusion
The aforementioned annotated bibliography amply demonstrates that MAEs currently pose a concern to patient protection. Since nurses are the ones who deliver pharmaceuticals, evidence-based quality improvement activities aimed at them are required. The numerous recommendations for prevention that are backed up by literary evidence are the four sources analyzed in this annotated bibliography’s main contribution.
References
Bates, D.W., & Singh, H. (2018). Two decades since To Err Is Human: An assessment of progress and emerging priorities in patient safety. Health Affairs, 37(11), 1736-1743.
https://doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.2018.0738
Koyama, A.K., Maddox, C-S.S., Li, L., Bucknall, T., & Westbrook, J.I. (2019). Effectiveness of double checking to reduce medication administration errors: A systematic review. BMJ Quality & Safety, 29(7), 1-9. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjqs-2019-009552