Cognitive Behavioral Therapy: Group Settings Versus Family Settings – Week 8 Discussion Sample Essays POST 2

Cognitive Behavioral Therapy: Group Settings Versus Family Settings – Week 8 Discussion Sample Essays POST 3

Week 8 discussion

Cognitive Behavioral Therapy: Group Settings Versus Family Settings

Cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) is an effective treatment for a broad range of psychiatric disorders and problems (Naik et al. 2013). CBT can be offered as an individual treatment, in a family setting or used in a group setting. Group cognitive behavioral therapy (GCBT) may be a more efficient form of delivering CBT in areas of the mental health system where providing adequate amounts of treatment for patients is challenging (Naik et al. 2013). To be able to recommend the use of GCBT in mental health settings, more work needs to be undertaken to establish patients’ perceptions of such treatment and whether it is effective in reducing symptoms (e.g., anxiety, depression, distress) in actual practice settings. In a study done to show the effectiveness of group CBT, it was assumed that CBT efficacy varies widely depending on the disorder presented. CBT is highly effective in the treatment of adult unipolar depression, adolescent unipolar depression, bulimia nervosa, childhood depressive and anxiety disorders, generalized anxiety disorder, panic disorder with or without agoraphobia, post-traumatic stress disorder, schizophrenia, and social phobia (Naik et al. 2013). Cognitive Behavioral Therapy: Group Settings Versus Family Settings – Week 8 Discussion Sample Essays

Group cognitive behavioral therapy has also been shown to be more cost-effective because Group treatment has been presented as a more cost-effective method of treating a large number of children and adolescents especially in children or adolescent with anxiety disorders, depression, bulimia nervosa to mention but a few. Group CBT result in reduced medical and nonmedical costs, thereby contributing to a societal cost offset, but in a family setting, there is the scarcity of properly trained therapists and high costs (Hedman et al.2010). However, CBT is not readily available in healthcare settings. Therefore, it is essential to develop and evaluate methods of therapy that are more time- and cost-efficient. Because health care resources are limited, there has been an increasing demand for cost-effective treatments that reduce the societal costs of sick leave and health care consumption (Hedman et al.2010). Cognitive Behavioral Therapy: Group Settings Versus Family Settings – Week 8 Discussion Sample Essays

References:

Hedman, E., Ljótsson, B., Andersson, E., Rück, C., Andersson, G., & Lindefors, N. (2010).

Effectiveness and cost offset analysis of group CBT for hypochondriasis delivered in a

psychiatric setting: an open trial. Cognitive Behaviour Therapy, 39(4), 239–250.

https://doi-org.ezp.waldenulibrary.org/10.1080/16506073.2010.496460

Naik, A., O’Brien, A., Gaskin, C., Munro, I., & Bloomer, M. (2013). The Acceptability and

Efficacy of a Group Cognitive Behavioural Therapy Programme in a Community Mental

Health Setting. Community Mental Health Journal, 49(3), 368–372. https://doi-

org.ezp.waldenulibrary.org/10.1007/s10597-012-9484-3