A recent court case related to employment termination in New Jersey was Debra Herbe v. Rutgers University. The plaintiff is Debra Herbe, the nurse, while the defendant is her former employer Rutgers University. The trial was completed in 2020, amid the COVID-19 pandemic, but lasted almost six years. The conflict was caused by the fact that the University Hospital suspended the plaintiff from the occupied position due to her taking an extended sick leave. The outcome was that the court decided the plaintiff’s sickness and absence from work were induced by the defendant’s actions; thus, Herbe won the trial.

We will write acustom essay on your topictailored to your instructions!

187experts online

Let us help you

Discussion

The trial was reasonable because the plaintiff had enough proof that her suspension from work was unlawful. Herbe used to occupy the role of clinical nurse coordinator at Rutgers since 2011 (Debra Herbe v. Rutgers University, 2020). According to the plaintiff, she was fired because of the whistleblowing incident that occurred at the workplace. Specifically, Herbe reported that two of her co-workers were involved in writing an application essay to the graduate program during working hours (Debra Herbe v. Rutgers University, 2020). The investigation of the complaint resulted in her colleague, Rosenberg, being removed from consideration for the program (Debra Herbe v. Rutgers University, 2020). This situation produced a passive-aggressive relationship between Herbe and her colleagues, who started to harass and criticize the plaintiff. These comments led to post-traumatic stress disorder in the latter, forcing her to take a long break from work. Since the plaintiff could not tell when she would return to work, the university had to suspend her employment.

In this situation, it is evident that the defendant fired the plaintiff for her extended absence from work, not for whistleblowing. Employers in the United States cannot fire or refuse to hire people based on race, gender, ancestry, national origin, age, sexual orientation, marital status, or religion (New Jersey Revised Statutes, 2020). Indeed, thanks to the activity of unions, various anti-discrimination legislative acts have been passed since the 1980s in the U.S. (Lansbury & Bamber, 2020). In the case of the plaintiff, she was not discriminated against by any of the abovementioned traits, but Herbe was fired since she was absent from work for a prolonged period. According to federal laws, employers have the right to suspend workers from their duties if their sick leave exceeds the established norms (Doyle, 2020). However, the sickness was caused by the employer’s indirect actions; hence, the plaintiff won the case.

Since this situation involved issues of academic integrity, harassment, and loss of employment, the human resource (HR) management at Rutgers likely had to face some serious ethical issues. For example, they had to continue working with an employee who tried to breach academic integrity by submitting an essay written for him by another person. Another problem was that people who contributed to Herbe’s mental health issues by continuously making negative comments could not be punished. In fact, this situation indicated that the HR department did not fulfill its duties properly if it resulted in such severe consequences. The ethical dilemma was that the actions of the employer compromised the privacy of the plaintiff. Since she was the only individual who saw Druist and Rosenberg working on the essay, Herbe became the immediate target of bullying from her colleagues (Debra Herbe v. Rutgers University, 2020). The university should have taken measures to protect the plaintiff from harassment. Moreover, considering the fact that Herbe was proven to be right, HR managers might face the issue of whether Rosenberg and Druist should be fired.

On-time delivery!

Get your 100% customized paperdone in as little as 1 hour

Let’s start

Since Herbe won the case, Rutgers University will likely want to appeal the court’s decision, suggesting that this educational institution will be involved in more litigations in the next five years. However, the indirect fault of the employer in causing the plaintiff’s illness was undeniable (Debra Herbe v. Rutgers University, 2020). Hence, the chance for Rutgers to win the case is not high. Moreover, the latter has the right to claim moral compensation in court, which will inevitably lead to more trials between Rutgers University and Herbe. Another possible future litigation may involve the university employees who were involved in haras