Findings from Articles or other Sources of Evidence as it Relates to the Identified Health Care Issue

The PICOT question outlined aims to establish the effectiveness of care coordination and collaborative paradigms in lessening the severity of risk for long-term complications of diabetes among diabetics under home-based care. Care coordination and collaborative approaches are best practices identified in the literature that maintain significance in the comprehensive management of diabetes. These approaches are based on teamwork, communications, role interdependence, and information sharing (Levengood et al., 2019). Care coordination synchronizes care approaches offered by diverse healthcare professionals available in healthcare toward optimizing care outcomes and enhancing patient experiences.

Care coordination approaches have been associated with reduced risk for diabetic complications. Care coordination also provides the groundwork for patient-centred care to prevent diabetic complications. This approach tailors care provision toward the beliefs and values of individual patients. It provides a platform for identifying factors contributing to patients’ diseases and may unearth factors leading to disease exacerbation and subsequent complications (Levengood et al., 2019). This highlights their utility in preventing long-term complications of the disease. The source used met the credibility criteria of timeliness, relevancy, purpose, authority, and accuracy.

Relevance of the Findings from Chosen Sources of Evidence to Making Decisions Related to a PICO(T) Question

Findings from the chosen sources maintain relevance in answering the PICOT question outlined. The finding affirms collaborative paradigms and care-coordination approaches as best practices in comprehensive diabetes management that considerably lower the incidence of diabetic complications. This addresses the outcome and intervention portions of the PICOT framework. Abdulrhim et al. (2021) assert that collaborative care models optimize diabetic management and may help reduce long-term complications of diabetes. This reinforces the significance of this approach and explains the need for its preferential utility of fragmented approaches. Findings from this source demonstrate its relevance to diabetic care. It informs best practices that can be used in preventing long-term complications of the disease.

Findings from the literature also point to the downside of fragmented care approaches that answer the comparison part of the PICOT question outlined. Kailasam et al. (2019) report that a fragmented care approach in diabetic care is associated with quality compromises in care provision, which in turn puts the patients at a higher risk for developing diabetic complications. This reinforces the need for a paradigm shift from fragmented care approaches to care coordination utilizing collaborative paradigms to prevent diabetic complications. Findings from this source are also valuable in informing best practices in diabetes management.

Conclusion

Long-term complications of diabetes remain a health concern. These complications have been implicated in the deterioration of the quality of life and mortalities. The PICOT framework provides a tool for identifying issues with diabetes management and guides searches for evidence to address these issues. Journal articles and organizational websites are vital sources from which evidence-based best practices can be obtained. These pieces of evidence detail effective and best practices in preventing long-term complications of the disease and answer the PICOT question outlined.