Is abortion basis on ability ethically justifiable?
Is abortion basis on ability ethically justifiable?
Abortion is one of the most contentious topics in modern history. To promote comprehension of the controversy, humans attempt to provide main perspectives on abortion unbiasedly. They emphasize the moral arguments and underlying issues rather than any external considerations involved. Induced abortion is the most contentious type of abortion. The two major viewpoints on the morals of abortion are referred to as the “pro-life” and “pro-choice” perspectives. The fundamental pro-life assumes is that induced abortions are immoral (ethically wrong, morally banned). Induced abortions are morally justifiable, as per the core pro-choice position (morally permissible, not ethically wrong). Humanity is shown to have “human rights,” which are moral obligations or entitlement to be handled in certain ways, and legal rights bestowed by states. A human individual holds the right to life and the right to liberty. However, a pro-lifer justifies reasons for induced abortion-related health risks to the mother. Based on ability, abortion is ethically justified to alleviate the suffering of a child born in low-income families.
Several pro-lifers agree that pregnancy termination is ethically right under special situation. Such instances include circumstances in which it is necessary to terminate the baby in order to save the life of the mother, or when the mother would very certainly be at risk of death if the pregnancy was carried to term. Rape and incest are two more contentious instances. In such scenarios, the view is that the unborn is not harmless or that the fetus’s right to life can be overcome or overawed by these other circumstances or situations. In some states, abortion has been used to substitute for family planning, which is wrong. Abortion is justified when the parent has financial constraints, the mother’s life is in danger, or if the pregnancy is unwanted, resulting from rape or another form of sexual assault (Robinson, 2021). Abortion should be prohibited if the family seeks to use abortion as a contraceptive since the process can lead to disability and organ damage.
Morally Relevant Differences
An ethical attitude implies being respectful of the views of others and the norm of society, questioning decisions and doing no harm. The ethical attitudes toward healthcare practices like abortion, sex selection, and selective termination provide fundamental debate in the healthcare system. The differences between ethical points regarding sex selection and justification of abortion based on ability are based on the difference between general abortion and sex-selecting. Justifying abortion based on ability is morally permissible. This context helps alleviate suffering in bringing up children among financially unstable clients. Sex-selection abortion is ethically unacceptable because it involves commodifying humans, making them ‘thing’ and not humans. Unlike justifying abortion based on ability, Sex-selection erodes ethical respect for human dignity (Robinson, 2021).
In conclusion, abortion has been defined as the termination of pregnancy before 20 weeks of gestation. Abortion approaches differ differently, creating a controversial topic in the healthcare system. Infanticide practices involving killing infants before one year of life have dramatically raised concern in the ethical field. Thus, research on whether it should be legalized based on congenital anomalies should be discussed. Access to safe abortion is the central focus of all health sectors. Sex-selection abortion involves using technology to a terminated child of undesired gender. These concepts have been widely disputed using morally good ethics as it involves commodifying humans and viewing them as ‘thing. ‘Abortion has been ethically justified based on health risk and financial ability.
References
a Rabbi, A., & Has, H. P. T. G. A. (2021). Sex-selective Abortion Bans: A Disingenuous New Strategy to Limit Women’s Access to Abortion. Politics.
de Silva de Alwis, R. (2018). Women’s Human Rights and Migration: Sex-Selective Abortion Laws in the United States and India.
JoĊska, A. Ethics of Abortion.
Rehmann-Sutter, C. (2021). Should prenatal screening be seen as ‘selective reproduction’? Four reasons to reframe the ethical debate. Journal of Perinatal Medicine, 49(8), 953-958.