MHA FPX 5028 Assessment 3 Best Practices Report The Implications of Implementing the Recommended Best Practices for the Organization
Many medical experts believe that the purpose of acute stroke management is to help patients become stable to complete initial evaluation of stroke. This may include various imaging tests and laboratory studies done after 50 minutes of patients’ arrival (Oliveros et al., 2020). Moreover, the benefit of using the best practices and implementing the faster stroke management methods such as tissue-type plasminogen activator (tPA) can help medical professionals and nurses to significantly improve the outcomes of patients and help the organization gain resilience and efficiency. The hospitals use this method on 2 patients per week.
Using these best practices will allow the organization and professionals to reduce the number of stroke-related deaths and utilize the available stroke treatments and survival tools to improve patients’ health. Hence, the goal of the acute stroke management is to stabilize the condition of patients and conducting assessments to ensure their wellbeing in a couple of months. The organization will also save costs of beds occupied in the emergency units and improve the quality of care by spreading more stroke awareness. In the near future, the focus of the organization must also be on affordability of stroke treatment, the quality of equipment and services, and the widespread accessibility of the treatment for all patients.
The Implications of Implementing the Recommended Best Practices for Consumers
Looking at stroke management through the best practices of strategies through a consumer’s perspective, management of stroke using the best practices is crucial because patients having a stroke always require immediate medical attention which can lead to instant treatment to minimize the long-term impacts of the diseases.
Moreover, the overall goal of our hospital is to improve the quality and performance of our overall healthcare environment; this is crucial because customers can trust providers with reliable and cost-effective processes which can be sustained for a number of years to improve the stroke management in the industry. This shows that using the best practices can allow patients to achieve their health-related goals and utilize the affordable care delivery methods and systems to enhance the outcomes of patients. Furthermore, better and stronger stoke management practices and procedures can result in better patient and family engagement. This can help the professionals and nurses to enhance various aspects of hospital performance such as enhancing safety of stroke patients and reducing their financial losses (Muehlschlegel, 2018). Better care experiences will result in stronger patient care outcomes and will also result in customer-provider satisfaction.
Get Your Paper Ready in No Time!!
Our Professional Ph.D. Writers are here for you!
The Challenges for Managing Providers within a Fee-for-Services versus a Risk-Based Contracting Plan
Every day, it is essential to attain the ultimate objective of enhanced healthcare quality in regards to managing stroke patients. In these turbulent times, the providers of use fee-for-service methodology that involves physicians and other health care providers to earn payment for each of their services provided to the patients. For instance, doctors may be paid for services such as medical tests and office visits (Powers et al., 2019). Many providers in California, United States show risk in the capitation payment method compared to a fee-for-service model. According to the Integrated Healthcare Association (IHA), the data shows that the capitation method relates to improved quality performance of the hospital.
Furthermore, as per MacKay-Lyon et al. (2020), the study shows that if the healthcare providers who care for all patients share risks, the providers have a greater chance to cure deadly diseases such as stroke or cancer. In many states, the prevalence of financial risks differs such as 18% in Central and 24% in Northern California. The fact remains that risk-based payment models also make the practitioners accountable for provide a high quality care to stroke patients. This makes them more efficient; however, this model is also known as the risk-based payer model. All the providers receive their payment as they treat a patient and are also questioned for using the budget per patient. Therefore, in this method, there is low reward prospect for the practitioners for offering their holistic services in a value-based care system. Whereas, in risk-based model, healthcare insurance companies such as Medicare create partnership with hospitals and transfer monetary risks to providers. This includes capitalized payments in bundles. This provides better incentive to practitioners in the United States and Canada. Therefore, i