MHA FPX 5028 Assessment 4 Proposes performance measures to assess the quality performance initiative.

Proposes performance measures to assess the quality performance initiative.

This section aims to explain the ways to qualitatively assess the program performance and what are the most effective ways to assess the performance of the WASH program.  For example, the qualitative comparative analysis mode is used that helps professionals related to water and sanitation (WASH) to improve research (Girma et al., 2021). This model has a great potential to offer rouse outcomes and results and also helps the researchers and physicians to use qualitative metrics to improve their knowledge. This implies that this method is based on the analysis of the underplaying empirically sound theories of change to improve the WASH research and evaluate its effectiveness. This makes it an effective model to assess the performance of this program. 

Get Your Paper Ready in No Time!!

Our Professional Ph.D. Writers are here for you!

Moreover,   in the initial stages of the implementation, the WASH assessment will be conducted within the first three weeks of any refugee emergency. This will allow identifying the right resources to meet their needs (Getahun, 2021).The evaluation will determine the total number of refugees impacted or affected by the program and that will allow quantifying their vital needs by providing them the available resources. The data shows that almost 1300 refugees were able to improve their gastric health and bladder issues due to the implementation of the WASH program. This shows a moderate and hopeful sign of improvement in their overall wellbeing. 

References

Getahun, W., & Adane, M. (2021). Prevalence of acute diarrhea and water, sanitation, and hygiene (WASH) associated factors among children under five in Woldia Town, Amhara Region, northeastern Ethiopia. BMC Pediatrics, 21(1), 227. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12887-021-02668-2