NURS 6051 Assignment The Use of Clinical Systems to Improve Outcomes and Efficiencies Example
The application and implementation of new healthcare technology require support from current literature. The literature may shed light on the benefits of using different clinical systems and the challenges encountered before, thus helping avoid similar challenges. In addition, research informs the selection of the best types of clinical systems. It provides results of related efficiencies and outcomes, assisting informaticists and healthcare institutions in trying different clinical systems (Atasoy et al., 2019).
One of the commonly used clinical systems is remote patient monitoring technology. There are different technologies and devices used in remote patient monitoring. Therefore, research literature can be used to identify the best, based on previous studies and outcomes or efficiencies. This essay presents the literature review in an annotated bibliography form, focusing on the role of patient monitoring systems in improving the outcomes of diabetes patients and improving the efficiency of diabetes care.
Annotated Bibliography
Su, D., Michaud, T. L., Estabrooks, P., Schwab, R. J., Eiland, L. A., Hansen, G., DeVany, M., Zhang, D., Li, Y., Pagán, J. A., & Siahpush, M. (2019). Diabetes Management Through Remote Patient Monitoring: The Importance of Patient Activation and Engagement with the Technology. Telemedicine Journal and E-health: the official journal of the American Telemedicine Association, 25(10), 952–959. https://doi.org/10.1089/tmj.2018.0205
The study focuses on assessing the importance of patient activation and engagement with remote patient monitoring technology in diabetes management among type 2 diabetes patients. Su et al. (2019) note that despite the research results on the effectiveness of telemedicine, and remote patient monitoring, a clear report is needed to identify the effectiveness in patient outcomes. Therefore, the study measured the improvement of care outcomes among type 2 diabetes patients using changes in HbA1c levels. A sample of 1354 type 2 diabetes patients used remote monitoring technology for three months.
The study found that most patients embraced remote patient monitoring technology and devices and had improved their self-monitoring skills over time. At the end of the study, the patients showed reduced HbA1c levels, thus indicating proper glycemic control, which can be translated as desirable diabetes care outcomes. The lessons learned from applying remote patient monitoring systems in diabetes management are that it improves patient outcomes. According to Su et al. (2019), patients are more likely to take keen initiative when monitoring themselves remotely, thus promoting better health outcomes by preventing complications and unnecessary healthcare expenses.
Johnson, E. L., & Miller, E. (2022). Remote patient monitoring in diabetes: how to acquire, manage, and use all of the data. Diabetes Spectrum, 35(1), 43-56. https://doi.org/10.2337/dsi21-0015
The focus of this study is to identify the different factors facilitating the acquisition, management, and use of diabetes technology and telehealth in diabetes management. According to Johnson and Miller (2022), remote patient monitoring technology would be ineffective without being complemented by telehealth, which enables the patient to communicate with the care provider and upload their progress so that the care provider can access them and give feedback. Therefore, it is vital to identify the facilitating factors, to avoid missing out or making preventable mistakes.
The diabetes care remote monitoring systems assessed in the study included insulin pumps, health apps and personal digital devices, smart insulin pens and pen caps, connected glucose meters, and continuous glucose monitoring systems. These devices led to improved diabetes care outcomes since lower HbA1c levels and self-monitoring behavior were noted among patients using them (Johnson & Miller, 2022). The lessons learned from applying these systems is that it is vital to consider other facilitating factors, such as patients’ knowledge and confidence in using remote patient monitoring technology to produce the desired patient outcomes.