NURS 6052/5052 EB004 Critical Appraisal Evaluation Summary and Synthesis of Evidence Example Evaluation Table for Evidence-Based Practice Project Full APA formatted citation of selected article
| Article #1 | Article #2 | Article #3 | Article #4 | |
| Citation | Fineout-Overholt, E., Melnyk, B. M., Stilwell, S., & Williamson, K. (2010). Evidence-based practice, step by step: A critical appraisal of the evidence: Part III. American Journal of Nursing, 110(11), 43–51. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.NAJ.0000388264.49427.f9 | Fineout-Overholt, E., Melnyk, B. M., Stilwell, S., & Williamson, K. (2010). Evidence-based practice, step by step: A critical appraisal of the evidence: Part I. American Journal of Nursing, 110(7), 47-52. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.NAJ.0000383935.22721.c6 | Buccheri, R., & Sharifi, C. (2017). Critical appraisal tools and reporting guidelines for evidence-based practice. Journal of the American Psychiatric Nurses Association, 23(6), 397–409. https://doi.org/10.1177/1078390317719326 | Fineout-Overholt, E., Melnyk, B. M., Stilwell, S., & Williamson, K. (2010). Evidence-based practice, step by step: A critical appraisal of the evidence: Part II: Digging deeper–Examining the “keeper” studies. American Journal of Nursing, 110(9), 41–48. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.NAJ.0000387953.42912.6a |
Evidence Level (I, II, or III)
| Article #1 | Article #2 | Article #3 | Article #4 | |
| Evidence Level | II | III | III | III |
Conceptual Framework
| Article #1 | Article #2 | Article #3 | Article #4 | |
| Description | The study builds upon the prior two parts of the series, focusing on evaluating the impact of Rapid Response Teams (RRTs) on ICU admissions and cardiac arrests. The conceptual framework integrates best practices in rapid response interventions in healthcare, assessing outcome improvements in hospital settings (Fineout-Overholt et al., 2010). | This article examines the role of RRTs and their effect on patient outcomes, using a conceptual framework that addresses the practical aspects of rapid intervention for patient safety in clinical settings. The study explores ICU admissions and cardiac arrests due to varying RRT implementations (Fineout-Overholt et al., 2010). | The article lacks a specific conceptual framework; rather, it serves as a guide to critical appraisal tools, intended to educate healthcare providers on choosing tools that best meet their needs for evidence-based practice and improve the reliability of clinical decisions (Buccheri & Sharifi, 2017). | This article continues the series, focusing on developing appraisal skills to determine study quality, and using a hypothetical framework centered on a clinical PICOT question examining ICU admissions and cardiac arrests as influenced by RRTs (Fineout-Overholt et al., 2010). |
Design/Method
| Article #1 | Article #2 | Article #3 | Article #4 | |
| Description | The study design follows a quasi-experimental format, comparing hospitals with RRTs and those without them. Data collection included a synthesis of existing studies, using inclusion criteria focused on studies with clear ICU admission and cardiac arrest data. Exclusion criteria eliminated non-relevant or low-quality studies. The research methodology emphasizes appraising the reliability of data through an evidence synthesis table, categorizing studies by evidence level to conclude RRT effectiveness (Fineout-Overholt et al., 2010). | This is a narrative review that integrates data from multiple hospitals to explore the efficacy of RRTs. Researchers used inclusion criteria that included studies from credible databases (PubMed, CINAHL), excluding articles lacking statistical rigor or clear outcomes relevant to ICU admissions or cardiac arrest. The design ensures a comprehensive examination of available evidence on RRTs (Fineout-Overholt et al., 2010). | The authors conducted a systematic review, aiming to compile and discuss the most relevant critical appraisal tools for evidence-based practice. Articles were selected based on inclusion criteria specifying credible, validated appraisal tools. The paper provides examples of tool applications in practice, with a design intended to assist clinicians in effective eviden
Order a similar paper
|