NURS FPX 4030 Assessment 2 Determining the Credibility of Evidence and Resources Assessing the Credibility and Relevance of Evidence and Resources

When it comes to managing cholecystitis, it is important to ensure that the evidence-based resources you use are reliable and credible. CRAAP test can be used which evaluate the resource’s currency, authority, accuracy, relevance, and objectivity. For cholecystitis, it is particularly important to choose your sources carefully. The Tokyo Guidelines, updated regularly since 2007 and most recently in 2018, are considered a highly authoritative and reliable source of information in this field. These guidelines provide detailed recommendations for managing acute cholecystitis, including information on the timing and type of surgery, the use of antibiotics, and non-surgical management options such as percutaneous cholecystostomy and endoscopic gallbladder drainage techniques (Garritty et al., 2021).

The Tokyo Guidelines are a set of guidelines that provide a standard drainage method for high-risk surgical patients. They are continuously refined and adapted to include emerging management techniques and findings, making them reliable. The guidelines also offer the latest developments in endoscopic gallbladder drainage techniques. Clinical practice has challenges regarding the severity grading documentation and antibiotic use; adherence to these guidelines is vital for appropriate antibiotic use and patient risk stratification. The Tokyo Guidelines are regularly updated to ensure the timeliness of the information they provide. As a result, they are a current and relevant resource for healthcare professionals managing acute cholecystitis. These guidelines are known for their authority, accuracy, and up-to-date information, making them a credible and comprehensive resource for healthcare professionals dealing with cholecystitis (Speroni et al., 2020).