NURS FPX 4030 Assessment 2 – Determining the Credibility of Evidence and Resources Student Name Capella University NURS FPX 4030: Making Evidence-Based Decisions Type 2 Diabetes and Evidence-based Practice
Type 2 Diabetes (T2D) presents a significant health challenge and an evidence-based approach is crucial for optimizing disease management strategies. Unchecked diabetes can lead to severe health complications and reduced quality of life, even resulting in mortality. The National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE), American Diabetes Association (ADA), and World Health Organization (WHO) guidelines offer comprehensive evidence-based care approaches, encompassing lifestyle changes, drug therapy, glycemic control, screening for complications, and managing comorbidities.
Determining the Credibility of Evidence and Resources
Implementing evidence-based practice (EBP) in the management of type 2 diabetes brings significant benefits as it allows for the application of the latest, high-quality research, ensuring current and accurate management strategies. Importantly, EBP supports individualized patient care, integrating patient preferences with clinical expertise and the best available evidence for an optimal outcome (ADA, 2021; NICE, 2021). Furthermore, the World Health Organization (2021) elaborates that evidence-based practices in healthcare settings promote standardized care, reduce variability and enhance consistency in clinical decision-making. There are several studies that support evidence-based practice in the healthcare sector. One of the studies promotes the adoption of EBP as it helps healthcare providers to enhance their health practice, which increases the likelihood of improved health outcomes (Wiviott et al., 2019). These supporting studies conclude that an evidence-based approach is critical and beneficial in managing various healthcare conditions, especially type II diabetes in the context of this paper.
Criteria to Analyze the Credibility of the Resources
The CRAAP criteria come in handy when you want to evaluate how trustworthy sources like journal articles and websites are. It consists of five elements: Currency, Relevance, Authority, Accuracy, and Purpose. Currency pertains to the freshness of information, involving inquiring about the publication or posting date and whether any updates or revisions have occurred. Relevance considers whether the information is important for your needs and whether it relates to your topic appropriately. Authority pays close attention to where the information originates from, taking into account the author’s background and affiliations. It considers whether the authors are experts in their field. Accuracy refers to how trustworthy and truthful the information is, considering factors such as whether there’s supporting evidence for it and if experts have reviewed or edited it. The essence of purpose lies in understanding why the information is present – whether its goal is to educate, enlighten, market, amuse, or convince. This inquiry also involves scrutinizing any potential prejudices, be they political, ideological, cultural, religious, institutional, or individual (Lowe et al., 2021). One specific resource that fits the CRAAP criteria is from the website of the World Health Organization.
World Health Organization. (2021). Global report on diabetes. https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240013131 4.
This resource on type 2 diabetes offers high credibility when evaluated using the CRAAP criteria as the information is updated currently using the latest research. Moreover, WHO is an international authority in public health and offers highly relevant information on type 2 diabetes. Its guidelines demonstrate accuracy, corroborated by extensive deep research and scientific rigor. Finally, the purpose of these guidelines is straightforward and aligns with WHO’s mission to provide unbiased, evidence-based guidance to improve global health outcomes. Thus, the WHO’s type 2 diabetes guidelines pass the CRAAP test, affirming their credibility and suitability for informing evidence-based practice.
Credibility and Relevance of Evidence and Resources
Three specific resources related to Type 2 Diabetes were analyzed for their credibility and relevance. The first resource is the American Diabetes Association (2021) “Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes Abridged for Primary Care Providers.” This resource is considered highly credible and relevant due to its extensive review process, use of the latest research, and endorsement by a leading professional body in diabetes care. It contains comprehensive clinical recommendations and guidelines for evidence-based practice. The second resource is the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (2021) “Type 2 diabetes in adults: Management” guideline. Produced by a reputable health authority, this resource is also highly credi