NURS FPX 4030 Assessment 2: Rationale for Applying an Evidence-Based Approach
The employment of an evidence-based approach is indispensable when it comes to managing chronic kidney disease for several reasons. The effectiveness of evidence-based practice in treatment has been proven and, as a result, helps enhance the quality of healthcare providers who give to individuals with CKD (Shlipak et al., 2020). By resolving evidence-based guidelines and recommendations, healthcare providers can select the treatments that favor clinical outcomes, arrest the disease progression, and reduce the risk of CKD complications (Cheung et al., 2021).
The complex management of CKD highlights that the best decisions are successfully based on the evidence process. Being familiar with the co-morbidities and numerous treatments available, healthcare workers must be sure about the best evidence they have as they practice their profession (Persson et al., 2021). Through the employment of evidence-based guidelines and protocols, a standardized way of managing this kind of renal disorder is tried to mitigate. It invariably reduces the variation of care delivery while standardizing care practices.
Literature Support for Evidence-Based Practice in CKD
Numerous evidence-based practice (EBP) studies have shown the positive impacts of EBPs in providing CKD care. One way of illustrating this is the author’s concise points in the clinical practice guidelines of Cheung et al. (2021), which precisely indicate the centrality of evidence-based interventions for blood pressure management in patients with CKD. By putting into practice suggestions of evidence, health professionals can control hypertension, a common complication in CKD patients, and avoid severe consequences for the cardiovascular system and kidneys (Hebert & Ibrahim, 2022).
Furthermore, Mahmood’s (2021) article accentuates telehealth and online resources’ contributions to communication and collaboration among healthcare professionals engaged in chronic kidney disease care. With the employment of communication technology-assisted methods, healthcare groups can share evidence-based knowledge, rally around patient care decisions, monitor patient progress effectively, and, in the long run, help improve the health outcomes for CKD patients (Fang et al., 2022).
Criteria for Determining Credibility of Resources
When the credibility of resources is affected by the evaluation process, several criteria should be considered to make an analysis of the information reliable and trustful.
Authority and Expertise:
Another consideration is the connection between the presented information and the author’s or creators’ presentation expertise. Assessing the requirements and skills possessed by these personnel involved in the content creation process gives an idea about the depth of the knowledge they use in their research. For journal articles, this information stays as the author affiliations and credentials are normally included at the beginning of the article. An example can involve assuming that websites would require an “About Us” or an “Author Bio” page in order to find out the credentials of the authors or the creators (Sye, 2023). To convert this criterion into a distinct measure for a particular resource will require verification of the authors’ backgrounds and up-to-dateness of the data in the area of competence.