NURS FPX 6111 Assessment 3 Course Evaluation Template
NURS FPX 6111 Assessment 3 Course Evaluation Template
The course evaluation template utilizes a mixed-methods format, combining quantitative (Likert scale) and qualitative methods (open-ended comment box). These methods comprehensively assess learning and program outcomes. According to South et al. (2022), the Likert scale is justified as an effective format to identify strong and weak areas of the course, enabling educators to make relevant changes according to students’ responses and preferences. On the other hand, Decorte et al. (2019) justify using an open-ended comment section as it permits students to provide detailed feedback, suggestions, and insights regarding their learning experiences, capturing detailed perspectives about strengths, weaknesses, and areas of improvement.
The criteria for evaluating these formats are comprehensiveness, user-friendliness, flexibility, and validity and reliability (Teasdale et al., 2023). The format covers all relevant learning objectives and program outcomes to ensure a thorough assessment of the entire educational experience (comprehensiveness). Moreover, the format is user-friendly as students can efficiently complete it, encouraging maximum participation and honest feedback. The flexible format allows generalizability to different courses and learning environments across various educational settings. Finally, the evaluation format is devised to produce valid and reliable results. It consistently measures the course’s effectiveness, making it applicable to students across diverse contexts.
NURS FPX 6111 Assessment 3 Course Evaluation Template
The validity and reliability of the evaluation methods can be established through different measures. While the validity of course evaluation is the degree to which the assessment methods measure the intended purpose of the evaluation, the reliability refers to the consistency and stability of the assessment results (Al-Alawi & Alexander, 2020). In the course evaluation form, content validity is crucial to ensure that the evaluative statements align directly with the learning objectives and program outcomes, ensuring that the evaluation accurately reflects cognitive, psychomotor, and affective domains.
To enhance reliability, the evaluation format should provide clear instructions, students should consistently interpret the Likert scale, and the open-ended comments section should allow for sufficient qualitative data to validate the quantitative findings. The strengths of our assessment formats include a comprehensive and balanced approach through quantitative and qualitative measures. However, there is a potential for responders’ biases based on socially desirable responses or influenced by external factors. Moreover, students may interpret Likert scale items differently, affecting the consistency of responses. To mitigate these weaknesses, educators may ensure anonymity, reduce biased responses, and provide clear instructions to enhance consistency.
References
Al-Alawi, R., & Alexander, G. L. (2020). Systematic review of program evaluation in baccalaureate nursing programs. Journal of Professional Nursing, 36(4), 236–244. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.profnurs.2019.12.003
Decorte, T., Malm, A., Sznitman, S. R., Hakkarainen, P., Barratt, M. J., Potter, G. R., Werse, B., Kamphausen, G., Lenton, S., & Asmussen Frank, V. (2019). The challenges and benefits of analyzing feedback comments in surveys: Lessons from a cross-national online survey of small-scale cannabis growers. Methodological Innovations, 12(1), 205979911982560. https://doi.org/10.1177/2059799119825606