PSY FPX 6820 Assessment 2 Analyzing TAIS Results Name Capella university PSY FPX 6820 Performance Enhancement in Sports

Analyzing TAIS Results Andrew’s potential as a team leader and quarterback positions him as a promising draft pick. His TAIS scores indicate strengths in categories such as external and internal distractibility, orientation toward rules and risk, self-criticism, decision-making style, and expression of criticism and anger. However, he falls below World Champ percentiles in information processing, control, physically competitive, and expression of support and affection. The remaining categories place him between percentiles. TAIS & Athletics The TAIS serves as a tool to distinguish performance enhancement needs and the requirement for alternative psychological services. It assesses communication and concentration skills aimed at enhancing performance. Its multidimensional design focuses on attentional and interpersonal styles crucial for high-level athletes like Andrew, who face increasing pressure. The tool considers gender differences in attentional focus and expression of affect. Additionally, occupation influences the measured skills, as observed in comparisons between white male college students and police officers. Andrew’s scores, particularly in distractibility, align with existing research. Strengths and Weaknesses Higher distractibility scores may lead to anxiety and performance weaknesses if overload occurs. Conversely, individuals with higher distractibility may integrate ideas better, enhancing analytical capabilities. These strengths and weaknesses are crucial for understanding an athlete’s performance potential. Priorities of Performance Competitive factors affect attention styles, emphasizing the importance of analyzing and integrating multiple ideas for optimal performance. Andrew’s ability to maintain focus despite external distractions is vital for overcoming environmental challenges during gameplay. Analysis Recommendation Andrew’s TAIS results highlight areas for improvement, particularly in maintaining focus and managing self-criticism. While his decision-making skills and orientation toward risk-taking are strengths, his low expression of affection suggests a preference for negative reinforcement environments. Understanding these nuances can aid in tailoring training and support strategies to maximize Andrew’s potential. Conclusion Andrew demonstrates significant potential despite identified areas for development. With tailored techniques and training, he can overcome challenges and excel as a draft pick. A deeper understanding of his individual traits beyond TAIS results can further support his recommendation. References EPSystems. (1974). Tais sales report sample – sullivan search. The Attentional & Interpersonal Style Inventory.https://sullivansearch.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/11/TAIS-Sales-Report-Sample.pdf. Nideffer, R. M. (1976). Test of attentional and interpersonal style. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 34(3), 394-404. PSY FPX 6820 Assessment 2 Analyzing TAIS Results Nideffer, R. M. (1990).