Theory-Practice Integration Essay Assignment Assignment Overview An annotated article review will be used to guide encounters with the examination of published literature on Theory Integration. An annotation is a short summary and/or critical evaluation of a source. An annotated bibliography helps you develop skills in critically reading and identifying the key points of an article and effectively synthesizing the content to determine its validity and usefulness. Prepare an annotated bibliography summary of 100 words (not more than 150 words) in one paragraph only. Use the article by Golden & Earp (2012) for this assignment:
Qualifications of authors
Shelley D. Golden is a member of faculty at the Gillings School of Global Public Health in University of North Carolina. She holds a PhD. and is an associate professor and vice chair for academic affairs in the department of health behavior. She has engaged in numerous research activities and published more than 60 journal articles (University of North Carolina, 2023a).
Jo Anne L Earp is a member of faculty at the Gillings School of Global Public Health in University of North Carolina. She holds a doctor of science in nursing and is professor emeritus and a past chair in the department of health behavior. She has engaged in numerous research activities and published more than 115 journal articles (University of North Carolina, 2023b)Theory-Practice Integration Essay Assignment.
Summary of argument and findings
Golden and Earp present an analysis of social-ecological approaches, noting that many of the approaches have typically been at the individual levels while ignoring the population levels. To justify their claims, the study adopts a secondary research approach that identifies 157 intervention articles published over the last 20 years. The results of the analysis reveals that while social ecological models have guided public health interventions at the individual and environmental levels. The application of these models have focused on individual and interpersonal characteristics of the population, while largely ignoring the institutional, community and policy factors that affect public health outcomes.
This research is useful for those looking to public health promotion efforts to include advocacy as it suggests a need to explore interventions at the individual levels as well as the population levels to foster successful outcomes. The results inform efforts to modify social and political environments to improve health.
References
Golden, S. D., & Earp, J. A. (2012). Social ecological approaches to individuals and their contexts: twenty years of health education & behavior health promotion interventions. Health education & behavior: the official publication of the Society for Public Health Education, 39(3), 364–372. https://doi.org/10.1177/1090198111418634
University of North Carolina (2023a). Gillings School Directory: Shelley Golden, PhD. https://sph.unc.edu/adv_profile/shelley-golden-phd/
University of North Carolina (2023b). Gillings School Directory: Jo Anne Earp, ScD. https://sph.unc.edu/adv_profile/jo-anne-earp-scd/Theory-Practice Integration Essay Assignment
251112__Social_Ecological_Approaches_to_Individuals_and_Thei