This week, you will write a 2-3 page paper discussing humanistic-existential psychotherapy and then compare it to a second approach you selected. Support all work with current literature. Attach the PDFs of your sources and explain why they are scholarly. Briefly describe humanistic-existential psychotherapy and the second approach you selected. Comparing Humanistic-Existential Psychotherapy with Other Approaches Comparing Humanistic-Existential Psychotherapy with Other Approaches Explain at least three differences between these therapies. Include how these differences might impact your practice as a PMHNP. Focusing on one video you viewed, explain why humanistic-existential psychotherapy was utilized with the patient in the video and why it was the treatment of choice. Describe the expected potential outcome if the second approach had been used with the patient. Support your response with specific examples from this week’s media and at least three peer-reviewed, evidence-based sourc
Humanistic-Existential Psychotherapy and Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy
Humanistic-Existential psychotherapy reflects the therapeutic approach that aids patients in realizing and understanding their distinctiveness. The context is through the in-depth comprehension of themselves and the environmental settings where they reside. Accordingly, the care provider aids the patient in recognizing individual baseline struggles to attain an extended, meaningful way of living (Lyons et al., 2018). This is achieved through the placement of emphasis on individual research coupled with purpose.
On the other hand, cognitive-behavioral therapy describes the therapeutic procedure that aids the patient in increasing the understanding of detrimental thought and behavioral patterns. Through the approach, the patient is assisted in effectively determining and examining measures in which their emotions and thoughts impact their normal functioning. After this goal has been attained, the patient is facilitated through a learning process for altering the negative thoughts and behavioral traits (Selvanathan et al., 2021). As a result, newer effective coping mechanisms are attained and are associated with person-centered outcomes.
Differences between Humanistic-Existential Psychotherapy and Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy and Impact on Clinical Practice
One difference is that humanistic-existential therapy delves into an understanding of oneself and the aptitudes for individually tackling significant mental healthcare issues. Through this approach, the care professional can aid the patient to conform to their underlying needs and desires (Pristipino et al., 2019). The context is through helping the patients ascertain the functional alongside dysfunctional way of living. Conversely, cognitive-behavioral therapy is founded on looking into the patient’s in-depth cognitive-based, affective-based, behavioral and motivational elements (McGuire & Storch, 2019). Psychotherapists can oversee their scope of practice through this foundation by highlighting the specific elements presented. As a result, the patient’s characteristics are differentiated, and more appropriate psychotherapeutic interventions for the best healthcare outcomes are devised.
Another difference is that humanistic-existential therapy delves into the underlying procedures for construing the individual perceptions of the patients. This aspect is essential in allowing the counselor to increase the comprehension of the patient’s baseline challenges for living a normal life (Pristipino et al., 2019). Consequently, psychotherapists can focus on community and worldwide elements reflective of being a person to aid the patient in developing better functionalities. Contrariwise, cognitive-behavioral therapy emphasizes that scenarios are not attributed to the presented emotional reactions (McGuire & Storch, 2019). Instead, it is understood that the responses depict the conceptions that link the patient to the multifaceted association within the context of their former way of life, moods, and elements of living. This foundation aids psychotherapists in helping individuals change how they live to a better way of life.
Additionally, humanistic-existential therapy is founded on determining the patient’s unique existential themes. These themes are then examined philosophically via therapeutic dialogues. This context aids the psychotherapist in associating with the patient in a phenomenological manner (Pristipino et al., 2019). The basis is by evaluating the baseline ideology of why the symptoms are the way the patient manifests them. The patient is then helped to differentiate between a humane and a negative way of living.
Conversely, cognitive-behavioral therapy delves into a learning theme reflective of the classical alongside operant functioning ways. Through this ideology, there is a concentration on the patient’s construed reality of how they are behaving cognitively. The patient is then helped to recognize the reality of how the actions are negatively impacting them (McGuire & Storch, 2019). Consequently, the patient is aided in changing the harmful cognitive and behavioral traits.
Reason for Using Humanistic-Existential Psychotherapy Approach in the Case Scenario
The humanistic-existential therapy was the preferred psychotherapeutic approach since it was identified that the patient had extensive problems with feeling a sense of being “alive.” This specific element makes it difficult for the patient to effectively relate to their personal feelings of true existence. Also, the patient cannot effectively construe what they feel and how that relates to their environment (Bugental, 2009). Additionally, the patient was previously diagnosed with anger management issues, mirr