Using a systematic approach, discuss the assessment and the priorities of nursing care related to the scenario demonstrate an understanding of the biopsychosocial factors that may influence the patient’s care.

According to Toney-Butler, T.J. and Unison-Pace, 2018, the first nursing assessment comprise systematic and ongoing data gathering, the first step in five stages of the nursing process and the sorting, analyzing, and organization of data, as well as recording and communication of data collection. Critical thinking skills within the nursing process offer a policy foundation for developing and guiding a patient care plan with evidence-based practices. This notion of precision training for customized treatment based on the particular cultural, spiritual, and physical demands of the individual, instead of a one-size-fits-all approach trail, leads to an advantageous conclusion. Thus, based on Mr. Doyle’s case, practitioner nurses need to incorporate appropriate health assessment of the patient by gathering information based on his medical history, physiological, sociological, and physiological needs.

Moreover, patient assessment is the initial stage in a patient’s practical medical, personal, and patient’s family history evaluation. An essential element of this procedure involves the collecting of subjective and objective data. Part of the evaluation comprises data collection, using the appropriate age or condition pain scale, by acquiring vital indicators such as temperature, burning rate, heart rate, blood pressure, and pain levels. The evaluation determines Doyle’s present and future treatment requirements through diagnosis. In this regard, the caregiver detects the normal and abnormal physiology of the patient and supports priority actions. Consequently, to determine the appropriate treatment of Mr. Doyle, the caregiver needs to consider encompassing various nursing processes such as assessment, analysis which is also equivalent to diagnosis, planning which involves developing a comprehensive care plan which contains nurse objectives, possible results, including interventions, implementation, and evaluation to determine whether the intervention was successful or not.

While assessing the patient to determine the appropriate priorities, the professional nurse should be able to understand that the initial nurse evaluation aims to define the parameters and responsibilities for evaluating and providing adequate individual patient care. In this regard, it involves documenting the successful level of care to ensure the patient’s need is met in a culturally competent as well as linguistically appropriate manner. Secondly, it should confirm information regarding community support and a safe plan of patient discharge. Therefore, it is essential for healthcare professionals, especially nurses, to strive to complete on a nursing admission assessment board, such that the data collected should be entered and may vary a little according to facilities, including, the admission history and physical examination will be changed to a hospital after the patient has reached the unit or condition (Arrigo et al., 2019 pp. 140).

Pain assessment is also crucial for evaluating the patient to offer an appropriate treatment plan for the latter. Thus, according to MacNee (2006 pp. 1202-1204), pain evaluation can be subjective and hard to evaluate. The patient or the customer says anything based on their pain. The numerous elements that impact the patient’s pain should be understood as informers. Thus, systemic pain evaluation, measurement, and re-evaluation increase the comforting abilities of the patient. Age-sensitive pain levels help to quantify and communicate pain in a concise manner between suppliers. Improving pain assessment communication and reassessing during admission and release procedures facilitates pain management, improving the overall function and quality of life. In addition, in 2017, opportunities for improved pain reassessment policies and processes were identified in the clinic according to one outpatient project performance and improvement. The study indicated that the pain reassessment conformity rates for the 30 minutes described in the clinical policy were low. The poor pain reassessment was due to the high loads of patients, staff recollection rather than documentation, and the absence of established processes in the electro-medical record (EHR). Hindrances to pain assessment and re-evaluation are significant benchmarks for efforts to enhance quality (MacNee, 2006 pp. 1202-1204). Therefore, primary pain management indicators, matched to an opioid epidemic and oversedation danger, all play a part in future research and quality research initiatives, aiming to enhance the pain management goals and overall patient satisfaction. Recognition of pain signs and complete knowledge in evaluating pain will lead to the procedures for treatment and pain.

Additionally, professional nurses need to perform a psychosocial assessment of Doyle to determine his health needs. In this regard, the health and emotional requi