Why do you think senior staff didn’t see the communication problems that junior staff experienced? using (Langer & Feeney, 2015)
Bridging the Communication Gap: Understanding the Disconnect Between Staff
The internal workings of public health departments require coordination and collaboration among professionals of different levels of seniority. As staff at various levels interact, there is a need to communicate promptly and accurately. Poor communication can have negative implications for the department's overall performance, internal relations, and ability to achieve its objectives. In the scenario presented, it becomes evident that there is a considerable divide between how junior and senior staff perceive their communication, thereby impacting their quality of interaction. This paper analyzes the sources of possible miscommunication, its implications on staff performance and organizational culture, and potential communication strategies to address these concerns.
Sources of Miscommunication
An analysis of the scenario points to several potential sources of miscommunication within the health department. One major source is a disparity in expectations and understanding between the senior management and junior staff. For instance, when senior staff argue that their methods are effective and junior staff say otherwise, there is a clear misunderstanding of what constitutes effective communication. This dissonance can be influenced by senior management adopting a top-down approach to communication that emphasizes delegation, which can lead them to believe they have effectively conveyed their messages. In contrast, junior staff may anticipate more inclusive and frequent communication patterns, contributing to a perceived gap in communication effectiveness.
Another source of miscommunication is the lack of feedback mechanisms or active listening among senior staff. If senior staff primarily communicate through one-way channels (e.g., directives, emails), it diminishes opportunities for junior staff to provide feedback or express their needs and concerns. This unidirectional communication approach may also overlook the importance of informal communication channels or peer-to-peer interactions among junior staff as vital channels for information sharing and morale within the team. Additionally, the lack of channels to effectively communicate individual and team successes and recognize individual and team contributions may lead to feelings of underappreciation, further inhibiting effective communication.
Furthermore, the selective use of communication methods based on performance (e.g., the organization of meetings primarily for addressing failures) may lead to negative perceptions among junior staff, fostering a sense of disconnection and disengagement. Due to the absence of regular, inclusive, and motivational communication, junior staff might feel undervalued, which can affect their morale and motivation to collaborate with senior staff.
Implications for Professional Performance and Organizational Culture
The existing communication divide between senior and junior staff within the public health department can result in several significant implications. From a professional performance perspective, communication disparities can hinder clarity in delivering roles and responsibilities. Unclear task instructions, objectives, or expectations can lead to errors, delays, and inefficiencies in work processes. The lack of acknowledgment and feedback for positive contributions or achievements undermines employee morale, job satisfaction, and their motivation to perform at their best. Insufficient communication may also lead to inadequate sharing of important insights, emerging challenges, and innovative ideas, constraining the potential of the staff to collectively solve complex public health problems. Consequently, this situation can indirectly reduce the department's effectiveness in achieving its objectives and delivering quality public health services.
Organizational culture can be significantly impacted by communication challenges. A situation where junior staff feel unheard or devalued in the communication process can foster a culture of skepticism, disengagement, and low employee well-being. This, in turn, can result in reduced trust between different levels of staff, which is essential for collaboration and team-building. The pervasive perception of poor communication can also contribute to an erosion of the overall organizational reputation, making it challenging to attract potential employees and diminish existing staff loyalty.
Need original Coursework?
Recognizing the existing communication gap as a critical issue, it is vital for senior and junior staff to collectively address the problem. The public health department can adopt several strategies to bridge this divide and promote a culture of transparent, inclusive, and effe